Skip to main content

Responsive (formerly RFPIO) vs Proposify

A side-by-side comparison of Responsive and Proposify for UK suppliers — features, pricing, and who each tool best suits. Honest about where each is genuinely stronger.

TL;DR

Responsive (formerly RFPIO): Responsive (rebranded from RFPIO) is a US-headquartered enterprise RFP/RFI/security-questionnaire response platform with a strong answer library, automation rules, and AI assist features. Largely serves US/EU enterprise sales teams.

Proposify: Proposify is a Canadian proposal software widely used by agencies and SMBs to design, send and track branded sales proposals. Focuses on design-led commercial proposals, not formal public-sector bid responses.

Responsive vs Proposify: side-by-side

FeatureResponsive (formerly RFPIO)Proposify
CategoryRFP responseProposal software
OriginUSA · founded 2015 (rebranded from RFPIO in 2022)Canada · founded 2013
Primary audienceMid-market and enterprise proposal teamsSMBs and agencies producing sales proposals
Pricing modelAnnual enterprise contracts, custom-quoted; commonly starting in the £10k–£20k/yr rangePer-seat SaaS, plans typically from around £30/seat/month (USD-billed)
UK public sector focusNoNo
Free planNoNo
Live UK tender feedNoNo
Bid libraryYesYes
Tender-pack parserYesNo
AI bid draftingLimited / assistLimited / assist

Where Responsive is stronger

  • Deep answer-library management at scale (10,000+ entries)
  • Mature integrations with Salesforce, Microsoft 365 and major sales platforms

Where Proposify is stronger

  • Beautiful, brand-rich proposal design and e-signature flow
  • Mature commercial-proposal tracking (open/view analytics, accept-online)

Best for Responsive

US/EU enterprise sales teams managing high-volume vendor RFPs with a large dedicated proposal function.

Best for Proposify

Agencies, consultancies and SMBs sending branded commercial sales proposals to private-sector clients.

There's also a third option

BidWriter — AI bid writing built for UK SMEs

If you're a UK supplier bidding into public sector contracts, BidWriter is purpose-built for the job — UK public sector specialism, AI drafting, integrated live tender feed, free plan, and per-seat pricing from £49/mo. No annual enterprise contract required.

Start free →See pricing

FAQs

What's the difference between Responsive (formerly RFPIO) and Proposify?

Responsive is rfp response for mid-market and enterprise proposal teams. Proposify is proposal software for smbs and agencies producing sales proposals. The full feature-by-feature breakdown is in the table on this page.

Which is better for UK public sector — Responsive (formerly RFPIO) or Proposify?

Responsive has no specific UK public sector focus; Proposify has no UK public sector focus. For UK suppliers bidding into government, framework agreements and NHS, the more specialist option is usually the better starting point — but worth weighing against the rest of the comparison table.

Is Responsive (formerly RFPIO) cheaper than Proposify?

Responsive's pricing: Annual enterprise contracts, custom-quoted; commonly starting in the £10k–£20k/yr range. Proposify's pricing: Per-seat SaaS, plans typically from around £30/seat/month (USD-billed). Whichever fits your team's size, contract length, and per-bid economics best is the right answer — both can work out cheaper depending on your situation.

Who should pick Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?

US/EU enterprise sales teams managing high-volume vendor RFPs with a large dedicated proposal function.

Who should pick Proposify?

Agencies, consultancies and SMBs sending branded commercial sales proposals to private-sector clients.

Related comparisons

Loopio vs Responsive (formerly RFPIO)Responsive (formerly RFPIO) vs Qvidian (Upland Software)Loopio vs ProposifyQvidian (Upland Software) vs ProposifyProposify vs PandaDocProposify vs Better ProposalsAutogenAI vs Responsive (formerly RFPIO)AutogenAI vs Proposify

See all BidWriter comparisons.