Who won: Purchase of Trust Server and Backup infrastructure

About this contract

The project aims to deliver a cost effective and specifically sized solution per site. The system should be able to offer local resources independently of the wider topology in which it resides, we need to strike a balance between cost and risk with options such as 'high availability', instant recovery and failover/failback being available but not required. Any proposal should be easily manageable by a range of geographically diverse staff using Roles Based Access Control principles, health reporting and alerting is required, any issue needs to be simple to remediate. To save on backup costs, it would be preferred if the proposal could protect itself both locally and by synchronizing with a peer on another remote site via existing site to site links (100Mbps minimum). Specific sizing could be done post award; however, it is essential that respondents can demonstrate general and specific requirements can be met. A per site and global implementation schedule is required showing key system milestones such as installation migration and cessation. To apply please email Simone Atkinson at [email protected] to request all relevant documentation

Who won contracts like this

• ✓Answer against the marking scheme, not the question text — NORTH EAST LEARNING TRUST scores each response, so map your evidence to the published criteria and weightings.
• ✓At £200,000, expect quality and social value to carry a large share of the score — price alone rarely wins goods work.
• ✓Show recent, comparable delivery: name similar goods contracts you've delivered for public bodies, with measurable outcomes.
• ✓This one's been awarded — but NORTH EAST LEARNING TRUST retenders on a cycle. Get matched the day the next one lands and start your draft early.

BidWriter drafts your responses from your company profile, scores them against the marking scheme, and tracks your whole pipeline. Free to start — no card needed.

Related resources

Similar contracts