Who won: Coalsnaughton Support Technical Review

About this contract

This notice is intended to inform that a call off from a Framework has taken place. The Coalsnaughton Incident requires multidisciplinary engineering input across structural, geotechnical, mining and geological matters. WSP is undertaking significant elements of the technical work and engineering development for Phase 2 under separate commissions approved through the MRA Engineering Services Framework. It is considered appropriate for the MRA to obtain independent technical assurance of key elements of this work. The appointment of SLR provides additional specialist challenge and advice to support the MRA in understanding the technical evidence presented, identifying material gaps or concerns and making informed decisions as the project progresses. The scope includes: • review of structural inspection reports relating to properties identified for demolition; • technical review of proposed protection and demolition works; • review and interpretation of available site characterisation information; • engagement with BGS; • review of relevant WSP technical information and deliverables; • participation in technical and project meetings; and • ongoing multidisciplinar

Who won contracts like this

• ✓Answer against the marking scheme, not the question text — MINING REMEDIATION AUTHORITY scores each response, so map your evidence to the published criteria and weightings.
• ✓At £299,900, expect quality and social value to carry a large share of the score — price alone rarely wins services work.
• ✓Show recent, comparable delivery: name similar services contracts you've delivered for public bodies, with measurable outcomes.
• ✓This one's been awarded — but MINING REMEDIATION AUTHORITY retenders on a cycle. Get matched the day the next one lands and start your draft early.

BidWriter drafts your responses from your company profile, scores them against the marking scheme, and tracks your whole pipeline. Free to start — no card needed.

Related resources